Miriam of Jerusalem gives the tribunal its most personal account yet of Saul’s persecution. She was among the believers arrested when Saul participated in a raid on a Christian gathering. Her testimony shows that his persecution was neither impulsive nor haphazard. Saul was organized, systematic, and thorough, pursuing women as well as men and helping create the fear that scattered believers beyond Jerusalem.
Paul draws attention to the irony that the persecution intended to destroy the movement instead contributed to its spread. Varro immediately refuses to let Paul claim providential credit for the consequences of his own violence, arguing that a man who burns a house does not become its architect because the survivors build somewhere else. Miriam nevertheless identifies an important continuity between Saul and Paul: the qualities themselves did not disappear. Saul did not become less relentless; he changed direction.
As the first week of testimony closes, the tribunal can finally see the man who approached Damascus. Tarsus had given Saul the ability to move among different worlds. Gamaliel had sharpened his intellect. His devotion had become certainty, his certainty had become persecution, and his persecution had reached from Stephen’s execution into the homes of ordinary believers. Varro has therefore established a formidable problem for the defense: Paul is asking Rome to trust a man who has already demonstrated how catastrophically wrong he can be. Paul’s answer is that something happened between the persecutor and the missionary. The tribunal is finally ready to hear what.
Change is inevitable. Resets are unavoidable. Starting over is a necessary part of life. It might be a new relationship, a new job, a...
Today we air a special episode of 1010 Thrive – the first in a five-part series about a man who remembered to give thanks....
Barabbas is mentioned in all four gospels of the New Testament: Matthew 27:15–26; Mark 15:6–15; Luke 23:18–24; and John 18:40. His life intersects that...